Abstract

The study objective was to understand if features derived from continuous pulse oximetry data can provide advanced warning of pulseless electrical activity arrest in the general care inpatient setting. Retrospective analysis of SpO2 and pulse rate data derived from continuous pulse oximetry was performed for pulseless electrical activity (n = 38) and control (n = 42) patient cohorts. Measures of central tendency and variation over time intervals ranging from 1min to 1h were used for inter- and intra-group comparisons. Logistic regression was applied to understand ability of features to predict pulseless electrical activity in future time intervals. Overall, the pulseless electrical activity arrest group tended to have lower mean SpO2 and higher mean pulse rate values than the control group. SpO2 and pulse rate variability was higher in the pulseless electrical activity arrest cohort. Changes in variability were observed beginning several hours prior to the rescue event. Up to 20min before rescue events, pulse rate features were significantly different from feature values for the preceding 30-min interval (> 10% difference in mean, > 46% difference in range). Similar results were found for SpO2 features 10min before the event (> 4% difference in mean, > 60% difference in range). There is a significant difference in SpO2 and pulse rate features derived from continuous pulse oximetry between pulseless electrical activity and control groups. Integration of automated feature calculation and clinician notification into clinical monitoring and information systems may increase patient safety by supporting early detection of such events.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.