Abstract
Infants with multiple congenital anomalies (MCA) can provide important clues in the detection of teratogenic agents. Definition, classification, and ascertainment of MCA vary, however. We present comparative epidemiologic data on MCA from two U.S. surveillance systems: the Metropolitan Atlanta Congenital Defects Program, which ascertains major birth defects during the first year of life, and the Birth Defects Monitoring Program, a nationwide system that relies on newborn hospital-discharge diagnoses. This system has two components: the Commission on Public Hospitals Activities (CPHA) and the McDonnell Douglas Health Information System (MDHIS). Our analyses were based on over 600,000 births occurring in Atlanta, and over 5 million births occurring nationwide. Infants were classified as having MCA if they had two or more major defects from different categories (central nervous system, eye, orofacial, gastrointestinal, cardiovascular, genitourinary, and musculoskeletal). Additional analyses were also done on infants with three or more defects. Compared with the nationwide system, Atlanta showed 1) a much higher rate of MCA (16.2 per 10,000 births vs. 4.9 and 3.8 per 10,000 births in CPHA and MDHIS, respectively) and 2) a higher rate of MCA with chromosomal syndromes (2.0 per 10,000 births vs. 0.6 and 0.3 per 10,000 births in CPHA and MDHIS, respectively). Moreover, in Atlanta, the proportion of MCA with recorded chromosomal syndromes increased substantially during 20 years. These data point to differences in the ascertainment of MCAs in birth defects surveillance systems. More effort is needed to improve the ascertainment and comparability of MCA in surveillance systems, an important step toward better detection of human teratogens.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.