Patterns and predictors of treatment in muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC): A real-world study.

Abstract

e16531 Background: Among the approaches to curative-intent therapy for MIBC, neoadjuvant cisplatin-based chemotherapy (NAC) is recognized as the gold standard. The combined modality approach of concurrent chemo-radiation is also considered a standard of care. Despite guidelines recommending multidisciplinary care, studies have shown a low adoption rate of multidisciplinary approaches for MIBC. This study aimed to describe the treatment patterns for MIBC pts using real world data. Methods: Following the appropriate IRB approvals, investigators followed a common protocol under the auspices of the Rapid Case Ascertainment at the Yale Cancer Center. Manual chart review was performed on MIBC pts diagnosed in Connecticut from 2004 –2015 and treated at investigator-affiliated hospitals. Information on medical history, comorbidity, and treatment types were recorded. This data set was linked to the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database for demographic information. The descriptive and logistic regression were used to analyze treatment patterns and predicators in each treatment lines: surgery alone, chemotherapy alone, radiation alone and standard care (NAC followed by surgery; surgery followed by adjuvant chemotherapy and concurrent chemo-radiation). Results: The number of adult MIBC pts in the cohort was 1,198. Among them, 290 (24.2%) received surgery as the only treatment; 117 (9.8%) received chemotherapy only; 100 (8.3%) received concurrent chemo-radiation; 96 (8.0%) received NAC followed by surgery. Besides age ( OR: 0.546, 95% CI: 0.289-0.986), when comparing female to male patients on the likelihood of receiving NAC to the alternative treatment types (radiation or surgery), female pts were less likely to receive NAC than males (OR: 0.421, 95% CI: 0.184-0.930). Conclusions: Regardless of demographics, the overall adoption rate of standard care was low, consisting of 236 pts (19.7%) of the population. From the logistic regression results, age was consistently shown as a predictor for receiving NAC over the alternative treatment types, and sex was identified as another strong predictor. Older and female patients were less likely to receive NAC than younger males.[Table: see text]