Abstract
Based on the survey data of Chinese graduate students in two universities in the U.S., I investigate the Chinese ethnic identity. With combined insight of identity theory and social identity theory...
Highlights
Structural symbolic interactionism emphasizes the impact of the structures of society on individuals’ interaction with others to convey who they are, or the meanings of their identities
This study contributes to our understanding of the social contexts in which ethnic identity varies in salience/prominence
A cosmopolitan sociocultural environment with high degree of diversity in terms of race/ethnicity and culture is conducive to the maintenance of ethnic identity when an individual has many co-nationals in his or her ego network
Summary
Structural symbolic interactionism emphasizes the impact of the structures of society on individuals’ interaction with others to convey who they are, or the meanings of their identities. Self—consisting of multiple identities—emerges from the patterned and organized social structure and is organized (Burke & Stets, 2009). Traditional symbolic interactionism opposes any suggestion that social structure is stable and posits that identities are fluid as individuals construct identities differently across situations. Along the lines of structural symbolic interactionism, identity theory argues for the correspondence between social positions in networks of social relations and role identities such as student. Empirical work to test and explore the relationship between identity and network characteristics has appeared. McFarland and Pals (2005) operationalize ego network context such as prominence to predict identity change. Empirical work to test and explore the relationship between identity and network characteristics has appeared. McFarland and Pals (2005) operationalize ego network context such as prominence to predict identity change. Walker and Lynn (2013) suggest that role identity salience—the likelihood a role identity is enacted— increases as role-based others are more closely connected with non–role-based others. Stark (2015) reveals how the tendency to avoid friends who have minority friends enables majority group members to stay away from minority group members
Sign-in/Register to view highlights & summary Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
