Abstract

The detection of patterns in monitoring data of vital signs is of great importance for adequate bedside decision support in critical care. Currently used alarm systems, which are based on fixed thresholds and independency assumptions, are not satisfactory in clinical practice. Time series techniques such as AR-models consider autocorrelations within the series, which can be used for pattern recognition in the data. For practical applications in intensive care the data analysis has to be automated. An important issue is the suitable choice of the model order which is difficult to accomplish online. In a comparative case-study we analyzed 34564 univariate time series of hemodynamic variables in critically ill patients by autoregressive models of different orders and compared the results of pattern detection. AR(2)-models seem to be most suitable for the detection of clinically relevant patterns, thus affirming that treating the data as independent leads to false alarms. Moreover, using AR(2)-models affords only short estimation periods. These findings for pattern detection in intensive care data are of medical importance as they justify a preselection of a model order, easing further automated statistical online analysis.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call