Abstract
Abstract The dichotomy between normative and processual archaeology is seen as false, both being essential and interdependent approaches to understanding the past. It is argued that the recovery and interpretation of cultural remains takes place on four logically successive levels which are set out in table 1. The development of West Indian prehistory is then viewed against this model.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callSimilar Papers
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
