Abstract

The image of the Nile, formed by Roman authors in the literature of the Flavian era, is compared to the so-called Nilotic scenes embodying a specifically expressed interest in Egyptian culture. It is noted that in relation to the end of the 1st century AD it would be incorrect to say that rhetorical attacks on Egypt, especially inherent of Octavian’s reign, have completely ceased: they continued to exist in parallel with new imperially politicized views, less contemptuous, but in any case emphasizing the importance of the conquest of Egypt. The conclusion is made that for Statius, as well as for Valerius Flaccus, the Nile remains a politicized object, but the focus of political interpretation is shifting from sharp criticism of the otherness of the new province towards rethink-ing the space of the Nile Valley as an integral part of the empire. The Nile is assigned only the role of a link between the events of the distant (mostly mythical) past and the present. At the same time, of the whole variety of plot lines of the Julio-Claudian era, the most stable are the negative motives of the works of Virgil and Lucan. At the same time, the political motives so representative of the literature of the second half of the 1st century AD are not directly reflected in the Nilotic scenes.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.