Abstract
BackgroundA universal health coverage policy was implemented in Thailand in 2002 and led to an increase in accessibility to, and equity of, healthcare services. The Thai government and academics have focused on the large-scale aspects, including effectiveness and impacts, of universal health coverage over one decade. Here, we aimed to identify patients’ perspectives on hospital visits under universal health coverage.MethodsA qualitative study was carried out in four public hospitals in rural Thailand. We collected data through focus group discussions (FGDs) and in-depth interviews (IDIs). The semi-structured interview guide was designed to elicit perspectives on hospital visits among participants covered by the Universal Coverage Scheme, Social Security Scheme or Civil Servant Medical Benefit Scheme. Data were transcribed and analysed using a thematic approach.ResultsTwenty-nine participants (mean age, 56.76 ± 16.65 years) participated in five FGDs and one IDI. The emerging themes and sub-themes were identified. Factors influencing decisions to visit hospitals were free healthcare services, perception of serious illness, the need for special tests, and continuity of care. Long waiting times were barriers to hospital visits. Employees, who could not leave their work during office hours, could not access some services such as health check-ups. From the viewpoint of participants, public hospitals provided quality and equitable healthcare services. Nevertheless, shared decision making for treatment plans was not common.ConclusionsThe factors and barriers to utilisation of healthcare services provide exploratory data to understand the healthcare-seeking behaviours of patients. Perceptions towards free services under universal health coverage are positive, but participation in decision making is rare. Future studies should focus on finding ways to balance the needs and barriers to hospital visits and to introduce the concept of shared decision making to both doctors and patients.
Highlights
A universal health coverage policy was implemented in Thailand in 2002 and led to an increase in accessibility to, and equity of, healthcare services
We identified participants using the number of focus group discussions (FGDs) or in-depth interviews (IDIs) and type of health insurance so as to maintain the confidentiality and anonymity of participants
The findings consisted of three emerging themes: (i) factors influencing decisions to use healthcare services in public hospitals; (ii) barriers to accessing healthcare services in public hospitals; and (iii) perceptions of free healthcare services in public hospitals (Fig. 1)
Summary
A universal health coverage policy was implemented in Thailand in 2002 and led to an increase in accessibility to, and equity of, healthcare services. The Thai government and academics have focused on the largescale aspects, including effectiveness and impacts, of universal health coverage over one decade. We aimed to identify patients’ perspectives on hospital visits under universal health coverage. Thailand achieved universal health coverage in 2002, all Thais are guaranteed access to healthcare services [1]. The Universal Coverage Scheme (UCS) covers 75% of the Thai population [1]. 9% of Thais, who are government employees; retirees; and dependants, As the largest proportion, one goal of the UCS is to ‘ entitle all Thai citizens to quality healthcare according to their needs, regardless of their socioeconomic status’ [3]. According to universal health coverage, primary care or ambulatory care is provided across Thailand. A total of 10,347 public health centres and 992 outpatient
Sign-in/Register to view highlights & summary Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
