Abstract

BackgroundThe main objective of this cross sectional study was to assess the psychometric properties of a new research instrument. The secondary aim was to analyze patients’ levels of dissatisfaction with the professionalism of medical staff.MethodsA social survey questionnaire was created and administered online. The instrument consisted of two scales: the 30-item patient dissatisfaction scale and the 10 items institutional scale. In this article, we assessed only the patient dissatisfaction scale. The research population includes 1838 subjects. The statistical procedures used were descriptive statistics, Pearson’s correlation, and factorial analyses with the SPSS.19 software. The internal consistency of the instrument was determined using the Cronbach’s alpha coefficient. We used a principal component analysis to investigate the factorial validity of the scale.ResultsThe patients’ scale of dissatisfaction obtained an alpha Cronbach score of 0.81. Three latent factors corresponding to three dimensions of dissatisfaction emerged from the data: medical staff’s ability to communicate, medical staff’s hygiene, as well as sanitary and privacy conditions within the hospital. The first factor explained 43.47% of the variance in patient dissatisfaction, the second factor explained 10.24%, and the third factor explained 7.59%; overall, the three factors explained 61.30% of the total variance.ConclusionThe Romanian healthcare system has an organization and management structure which has shown few changes since the communist period. Our study indicates that although more than 25 years have passed since the political regime changed in Romania and the introduction of a different system of social care, there have been no corresponding changes in the medical staff’s mentality or in the way that patients are approached. The present assessment of patient dissatisfaction is not a strictly theoretical exercise; it also represents a valuable instrument for healthcare system management.

Highlights

  • The main objective of this cross sectional study was to assess the psychometric properties of a new research instrument

  • We have examined patient satisfaction regarding the health care providers’ professionalism of in Romanian hospitals

  • The present assessment of the elements of patient dissatisfaction was not a strictly theoretical exercise; it represents a valuable instrument for healthcare system management

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The main objective of this cross sectional study was to assess the psychometric properties of a new research instrument. At least theoretically, an important objective of hospital managers, “a proxy, and an effective indicator, to measure the success of doctors and hospitals” [1] It has become one of the most used criteria for establishing health care quality [2,3,4]. Health care literature has described the following two dimensions of quality health services as the basic elements of patient satisfaction: procedural dimension (the anticipation of the patient’s need, treatment provided, and hospitalization and discharge methods) and personal dimension (the physical aspect of cleanness, maintenance, relationships with the medical staff) [7,8,9,10,11,12]. It is questionable whether asking about the patient’s level of satisfaction upon leaving the hospital has become a routine procedure

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call