Abstract

BackgroundThe most common bariatric procedures, Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB), adjustable gastric banding (LAGB), and sleeve gastrectomy (SG), generally induce significant weight loss and health improvements. However, little is known about how patients decide which procedure to undergo. ObjectiveInvestigate patients’ reasons for and against undergoing RYGB, LAGB, and SG. SettingOnline questionnaire. MethodsData were analyzed from 236 Australian adults with current RYGB (15.7%), LAGB (22.0%), or SG (62.3%) who completed a questionnaire including an open-ended question about why they underwent their procedure. Data were coded for content and analyzed. ResultsPatients most often underwent RYGB because of its evidence base and success rate and the patient’s characteristics, whereas the most common reason for SG was a medical practitioner’s recommendation, preference, or choice, followed by the patients’ evaluation of information gathered from their own research and observations of others’ success. The most common reasons for undergoing LAGB related to characteristics of the procedure, including its reversibility and a perception of LAGB as less invasive. The most common reason against undergoing both RYGB and SG was a desire to avoid postsurgical complications and risks such as leaks or malabsorption, whereas the most common reason against LAGB was information and evidence from other people’s unsuccessful experiences and failure rates. ConclusionsPatients’ reasons for and against procedures differed by procedure. In addition to the surgeon’s influence, patients demonstrated clear procedure preferences based on their own research, knowledge, and experiences. Preferences should be understood to assist patients to select the most appropriate procedure for their circumstances.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.