Patients’ perspectives on shared decision making in secondary mental healthcare in Taiwan: A qualitative study

Abstract

ObjectiveThe aim of this study is to explore patient perspectives on shared decision making in secondary mental healthcare in Taiwan. MethodsQualitative semi-structured interviews were used to explore patient perspectives on shared decision making in secondary mental healthcare in Taiwan. Individual semi-structured interviews were conducted from July to August 2017 with a purposive sample of twenty patients using halfway houses. Data were analysed using thematic analysis. ResultsAnalysis of the interviews identified two themes: barriers to shared decision making; facilitators of shared decision making. Patients perceived that they were not involved in decision making due to: the professional status of health professionals; negative perception of making decisions; and limited time resources. However, patients reported a desire to be involved and felt sufficient information exchange would be a necessary step towards collaboration/sharing decisions about treatment with clinicians. ConclusionThe findings provided an understanding of significant barriers to and facilitators of implementing shared decision making to aid further professional training and the development of national policies. Practice implicationsThe findings could be the basis for developing effective strategies to overcome barriers to shared decision making and improve the process quality of delivering shared decision making.