Patients en rémission partielle ou totale d’un Épisode Dépressif Majeur dans le cadre d’un trouble dépressif récurrent : description de la population incluse dans l’étude ÉCLAIR

Abstract

Some guidelines and expert consensus consider the way of care management practices for the recurrent depressive disorder, particularly according to different identified risk factors for recurrence. But, few data are available about the way that these risk factors influence the care management of depressive recurrent patients during the partial or complete remission phase. Eclair study is a longitudinal observatory multicentric and national study, which describes the different risk factors that influence the psychiatrist decision about the following of patients suffering form Major Depressive Disorder (at least 3 Major Depressive Episode (MDE) according to DSM IV). This article presents the inclusion data (V0) of patients, with a focus on their demography characteristics and history of trouble, diagnosis, symptomatology evaluation (with CGI-S, HAM-D, Carroll scale and Sheehan scale) and Cloninger's personality questionnaire (TCI). A total of 596 patients with a recurrent depression either on partial remission (PaR) or complete remission (ToR) to their last episode at the selection, have been included. Complete remission was defined by the presence of a maximum of two criteria of MDE (according to DSM IV) excepted depressed mood and diminished interest or pleasure during at least two months with a HAM-D (17 items) score < 7 and partial remission was defined by the persistence of depressed symptoms but not sufficient to complete a diagnosis of MDE (according to DSM IV) associated with a HAM-D (17 items) score between 8 and 13 included. Mean HAM-D scores at V0 were 10.3 +/- 1.6 for PaR group and 4.0 +/- 1.9 for the ToR group. Free time since last episode was 6.5 +/- 10.5 months in ToR group and 11.2 +/- 16.9 months in PaR group (n = 385). Residual symptomatology between prior episodes was systematically present for 47.6% patients in PaR group, and for 26.7% patients ToR group. The feel to have a stressful daily life persisted for 62.5% of patient in PaR group and 34.3% in ToR group; 70.3% patients in PaR group and 57.9% patients in ToR group reported persistence of causal factor. The main collected risk factors for recurrence were the number of prior depressive episodes (64.9%), familial conflict existence (52.9%) and recent events of life (45.1%). In the TCI, a significant difference in comparison with the French normative data has been found for 3 dimensions: Harm Avoidance, Cooperativeness and Self-Directedness. Some differences were obtained for Novelty Seeking, Reward Dependence, and Self-Transcendence, but without sufficient clinical significance.This study confirms various characteristics about the unipolar depressive disorder, particularly the high risk of recurrence in patients with high number of previous episodes. In the research of predictive depressive recurrence signs, it would be interesting to focus on discriminating elements between complete remitted patients and partial remitted patients.