Abstract

Simple SummaryLiver transplantation (LT) is the only definitive treatment to cure hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) in cirrhosis. Unfortunately, the shortage of donor livers limits access to the best available therapy. As a consequence, transplant candidates undergo selection for transparent waiting list acceptance and priority using the model for end-stage liver disease (MELD). Allocation of standard exception (SE) points for HCC inside the Milan-criteria balances the underrepresented urgency by labMELD in these patients who are exposed to tumor progression. Moreover, patients with HCC outside Milan can undergo LT without SE and might benefit from extended criteria donor (ECD)-grafts. We hypothesized that LT for Milan-out patients is associated with a more complicated postoperative course, reflecting higher costs. Interestingly, we found that LT for patients with Milan-in and Milan-out had comparable donor risk index, clinical outcome and cost-effectiveness. In conclusion, LT with ECD-grafts can have the maximum benefit for selected patients and bear limited financial risk.Liver transplantation (LT) is the only definitive treatment to cure hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) in cirrhosis. Waiting-list candidates are selected by the model for end-stage liver disease (MELD). However, many indications are not sufficiently represented by labMELD. For HCC, patients are selected by Milan-criteria: Milan-in qualifies for standard exception (SE) and better organ access on the waiting list; while Milan-out patients are restricted to labMELD and might benefit from extended criteria donor (ECD)-grafts. We analyzed a cohort of 102 patients (2011–2020). Patients with labMELD (no SE, Milan-out, n = 56) and matchMELD (SE-HCC, Milan-in, n = 46) were compared. The median overall survival was not significantly different (p = 0.759). No difference was found in time on the waiting list (p = 0.881), donor risk index (p = 0.697) or median costs (p = 0.204, EUR 43,500 (EUR 17,800–185,000) for labMELD and EUR 30,300 (EUR 17,200–395,900) for matchMELD). Costs were triggered by a cut-off labMELD of 12 points. Overall, the deficit increased by EUR 580 per labMELD point. Cost drivers were re-operation (p < 0.001), infection with multiresistant germs (p = 0.020), dialysis (p = 0.017), operation time (p = 0.012) and transfusions (p < 0.001). In conclusion, this study demonstrates that LT for HCC is successful and cost-effective in low labMELD patients independent of Milan-criteria. Therefore, ECD-grafts are favorized in Milan-out HCC patients with low labMELD.

Highlights

  • Liver transplantation (LT) is a standard procedure in the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC)

  • The HCC diagnosis was based on image morphology except for biopsy in 19 cases (18.6%) before ET listing to rule out a CCC

  • The median DRI was for the entire collective as well as for the labMELD and matchMELD collective 2.27 (1.14–4.10), 2.29 (1.40–4.10) and 2.17 (1.14–3.09) and the donor age was 62 (6–86), 63 (10–86) and 61 (6–86), respectively

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Liver transplantation (LT) is a standard procedure in the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). LT is known to have the highest impact on quality adjusted life years (QALYs) in small tumor stages, costs for LT are higher compared to other curative treatment options [1,2]. Reports on higher tumor stages are missing. In parallel with organ shortage and increasing costs of transplantation programs [3], the limits of the transplant indication are being expanded without taking financial resources into account.

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.