Patients are harmed (again), fingers point. What's wrong?

Abstract

<h3>Objectives</h3> To determine growth outcomes at 11 years of age in children born &lt;27 weeks of gestation in England in 2006 (EPICure2) and to compare growth from birth to 11 years of age for births&lt;26 weeks with those in England in 1995 (EPICure). <h3>Methods</h3> 200 EPICure2 children assessed at 11 years alongside 143 term-born controls. Growth measures from birth to 11 years were compared for births&lt;26 weeks between EPICure2 (n=112) and EPICure (n=176). Growth parameter z-scores were derived from 1990 UK standards. <h3>Results</h3> Among EPICure2 children, mean z-scores for height and weight were close to the population standards (0.08 and 0.18 SD, respectively) but significantly below those of controls: difference in mean (Δ) z-scores for weight −0.42 SD (95% CI −0.68 to –0.17), for height −0.45 SD (−0.70 to –0.20) and for head circumference (HC) −1.05 SD (−1.35 to –0.75); mean body mass index (BMI) z-score in EPICure2 children was 0.18 SD, not significantly different from controls (0.43 SD, p=0.065). Compared with EPICure, EPICure2 children born &lt;26 weeks at 11 years had higher z-scores for weight (Δ 0.72 (0.47, 0.96)), height (Δ 0.55 (0.29, 0.81)) and BMI (Δ 0.56 (0.24, 0.87)), which were not fully explained by perinatal/demographic differences between eras. Weight catch-up was greater from term-age to 2.5/3 years in EPICure2 than in EPICure (1.25 SD vs 0.53 SD; p&lt;0.001). Poor HC growth was observed in EPICure2, unchanged from EPICure. <h3>Conclusions</h3> Since 1995, childhood growth in weight, height and BMI have improved for births &lt;26 weeks of gestation, but there was no improvement in head growth.