Abstract

We report on quality of life (QOL) and early toxicity among men with prostate cancer who underwent transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP) before proton therapy. Between 2006 and 2010, 1,289 patients were treated definitively with proton therapy for prostate cancer at our institution and enrolled on a prospective outcomes-tracking protocol. Ninety-six of the men had received a TURP before proton therapy, while 1,193 men had not. Baseline comorbidities, medications, expanded prostate index composite (EPIC) score, international prostate symptom score (IPSS), and CTCAE vs.3 toxicity assessment were collected prospectively. The Kaplan-Meier product limit method was used to estimate freedom from toxicity. Men who had TURP before proton therapy had lower baseline EPIC scores for urinary incontinence, bowel summary, and sexual summary compared with the non-TURP group, but no significant difference in urinary obstructive score was observed. After controlling for baseline scores, there was no significant difference in bowel summary or sexual summary scores between the two groups over time. There were, however, differences for urinary irritation/obstruction scores and urinary incontinence scores favoring those patients who did not have a TURP-like procedure. Toxicity assessment showed that the 2-year and 5-year rates of grade 3 genitourinary toxicity in the pretreatment TURP group were 12.3% and 17.2%, respectively. Pretreatment TURP was associated with both a high incidence of physician-assessed toxicity and inferior patient-reported QOL scores both before and after proton therapy treatment. Studies investigating QOL and toxicity after specific prostate cancer therapies should stratify patients by pretreatment TURP. Longer follow-up is needed to confirm if these differences ever resolve.

Highlights

  • There are various approaches to the definitive management of localized prostate cancer, including surgery, brachytherapy, and external-beam radiation therapy

  • The transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP) group already had lower median bowel summary, sexual summary, and urinary incontinence subscales compared to the non-TURP group

  • Within the TURP cohort, time from TURP to start of proton therapy (,1 year vs .1 year) and type of TURP (TURP vs TURP-like procedure) did not impact baseline quality of life (QOL) scores in a statistically significant manner

Read more

Summary

Introduction

There are various approaches to the definitive management of localized prostate cancer, including surgery, brachytherapy, and external-beam radiation therapy. Prior studies suggest that men with prostate cancer who undergo TURP may have a greater likelihood of urinary complications after external-beam radiotherapy than men who do not undergo TURP, with rates of grade 3 gentiourinary (GU) toxicity ranging from as low as 3% [4] to as high as 16% [5]. Despite these findings, patient-reported QOL using validated instruments such as the Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite (EPIC) have not been well studied in this cohort of patients

Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call