Abstract

BackgroundMany patient-reported outcome (PRO) on disease severity quality of life (QOL) have been developed for atopic dermatitis (AD) patients. However, none of them on the reliability and validity of the instruments was sufficient for their application in clinical studies. The objective of this study is to identify and assess the quality of recently developed PROs for disease severity and QOL in English and Chinese in AD patients.MethodsWe conducted a systematic review of PROs for disease severity and QOL for AD from PubMed, Web of Science, PsycINFO and ERIC (English literatures), and CNKI and Wanfang Data (Chinese literatures) from September 2010 to December 2021 with string including “atopic dermatitis” and “scaling”. All studies were screened by 2 reviewers. After being removed duplications, the studies developed the instruments for the AD patients, were reported by patients, and assessing the disease severity or QOL were included.ResultsTwenty-six instruments were retrieved. Three single-item Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) and 8 multidimensional instruments assessing disease severity and 15 assessing QOL were found to be originally developed in English (n=23) or Chinese (n=3). After full assessment on the reliability and validity, 3 NRS and 9 multidimensional instruments were recommended. The 3 NRS were Peak Pruritus/Itch NRS, Skin Pain NRS and Sleep Disturbance (SD) NRS. The multidimensional instruments for disease severity included the Patient-Oriented Eczema Measure (POEM), the patient oriented-SCORAD (PO-SCORAD), and Atopic Dermatitis Symptom Score (ADSS), and the instruments for QOLs included Infant’s Dermatology Quality of Life Index (IDQOL), Children’s Dermatology Life Quality Index (CDLQI), Atopic Dermatitis Control Tool (ADCT), PROMIS® Itch Questionnaire Mood and Sleep (PIQ-MS), PROMIS-Sleep Disturbance (PROMIS-SD), and PROMIS-Sleep-Related Impairment (PROMIS-SRI) for QOL. However, none of the Chinese PROs either originally developed or adapted were fully validated.DiscussionSingle-item NRS is a complement to multidimensional PROs in assessing the disease severity of AD. Quality of these instruments vary greatly and only a few instruments that meet the Consensus-based Standards for the Selection of Health Measurement Instruments (COSMIN) standards are recommended. Therefore, standardization of PROs is essential for developing new instruments, and for adapting a PRO in other populations with different culture and languages.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call