Patient-oriented online resources in pediatric surgery: Are we failing the readability test?

Abstract

BackgroundThe study aim was to evaluate the readability of patient-oriented resources in pediatric surgery from children's hospitals in the US. MethodsThe websites of 30 children's hospitals were evaluated for information on 10 common pediatric surgical procedures. Hospitals of varying characteristics including bed number, geographic location and ACS Children's Surgery Verification (CSV) were selected for the study. Readability scores were calculated using validated algorithms, and text was assigned an overall grade level. ResultsOf 195 patient-oriented resources identified, only three (2%) were written at or below the recommended sixth grade level. Larger hospitals provided patient information at a higher grade level than medium and smaller sized centers (10.7 vs 9.3 vs 9.0 respectively, p < 0.001). Hospital size also correlated with availability of information, with large and medium sized hospitals having information more often. Hospitals with ACS CSV had information available more often, and written at a lower grade level, compared to nonverified centers (78% vs 62%, p = 0.023; 9.0 vs 10.0, p = 0.013). ConclusionMost hospital provided patient-oriented resources in pediatric surgery are written at a grade level well above the national guidelines. Centers with ACS CSV status have improved availability and readability of this material, while larger hospitals have improved availability, but decreased readability. Type of studyModeling study. Level of evidenceIII