Abstract
Current legal regulations concerning the right of self-determination of subjects who are not competent to give consent have been in force since 2009. According to the new regulations, such subjects can exercise their right of self-determination through a legal guardian who will assess and impose their will. If there is an operative advance directive covering the specific case, the guardian is bound by the provisions laid down in it. Although primarily intended for end-of-life decisions, the law applies in all cases of a subject's inability to give consent, including the context of mental illness. It allows the persons concerned to define certain aspects of medical treatment in advance. On the one hand, the right of self-determination of mentally ill people is thus strengthened. On the other hand, the new regulations can also cause significant ethical conflict involving patients and their representatives as well as family members and practitioners. The present contribution presents the consequences of the amendment for the treatment of mentally ill people. Case studies are described in order to illustrate the new regulations in clinical situations.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
