Abstract

Goal-orientated health care accounts for patient preferences and values, not just physician treatment aims. The Global Initiative for Asthma (GINA) management strategy states that clinicians should elicit patients' own treatment goals as a central part of care. Despite this recommendation, data on patients' treatment goals are sparse among patients with severe asthma. The objective of this study is to investigate the relationship between rates of treatment adherence and goal achievement, and patient-selected goals. Thematic analysis was used to characterize patient-selected goals. Previously undescribed goal categories in asthma were identified, quantified, and related to clinical characteristics. Goal achievement was aligned with objectively measured treatment adherence. Three categories of patients-selected goals were identified from 2 randomized control trials: disease-specific (n= 98 [51%] and n= 92 [54%], respectively), function-related (n= 90 [48%] and n= 61 [36%]), and knowledge (n= 1 [1%] and n= 17 [10%]). Only 53% of goals aligned with clinician treatment goals. Patients who chose disease-specific goals were more likely to achieve both control and their specified goal (n= 98 [45%], odds ratio: 1.789, confidence interval: 1.066-3.001). Male participants are more likely to focus on disease-specific goals. Patients who achieved their goals were more likely to be T2-high, have an elevated fractional exhaled nitric oxide (FeNO) at their first visit, and have a lower FeNO value at their final visit. Interestingly, adherence rates decline significantly for those who achieve their goals. Almost half of patient-selected goals do not align with GINA clinical asthma management goals. Participants who chose goals that do align with clinicians were more likely to achieve them.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call