Patient-reported outcome measures after mobile-bearing unicompartmental knee arthroplasty were better than medial opening-wedge high tibial osteotomy in early elderly patients with severe osteoarthritis.

Abstract

Many countries are faced with aging populations. However, few studies have directly compared the clinical outcomes of medial opening-wedge high tibial osteotomy (OWHTO) and mobile-bearing unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (MB-UKA) in early elderly patients. Thus, we aimed to investigate the clinical outcomes after OWHTO and MB-UKA in early elderly patients with similar demographics and osteoarthritis (OA) severity. Three hundred and fifteen OWHTO and 142MB-UKA were performed for medial compartment OA by a single surgeon between August 2009 and April 2020. Among them, patients aged 65-74years with more than two years of follow-up were enrolled. The patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs), including visual analog scale (VAS) score and Japanese Knee Osteoarthritis Measure (JKOM) score, were compared between both procedures preoperatively and at the last follow-up. The PROMs were compared between the groups by Kellgren-Lawrence (K-L) OA grades. Seventy-three OWHTO and 37MB-UKA patients were enrolled. No significant differences were found in the distribution of age, gender, follow-up period, body mass index, and Tegner activity scale between the two procedures. The postoperative PROMs in patients with K-L grade 4 were better after MB-UKA than OWHTO at the mean follow-up of 5years. No significant difference was found in PROMs in patients with K-L grades 2 and 3. ThePROMs after MB-UKA were superior to that after OWHTO in early elderly patients with severe OA. In particular, pain relief was better after MB-UKA than OWHTO with severe OA. Meanwhile, no significant difference in PROMs was found with moderate OA patients. Level IVprospective cohort study.