Patient-Reported Disability After Computerized Posturographic Vestibular Retraining for Stable Unilateral Vestibular Deficit

Abstract

Individuals with persistent unilateral vestibular deficits experience loss of quality of life and increased risk of falling, and they have few well-supported options for effective treatment. To evaluate whether vestibular retraining using computerized dynamic posturography is associated with reduced participant-reported disability for patients with an objectively assessed unilateral peripheral vestibular deficit and to assess the feasibility of conducting a randomized clinical trial of vestibular retraining using computerized dynamic posturography. This single-group cohort study was conducted from April 29 to July 23, 2021, in a tertiary neurotology clinic among 13 individuals with a stable unilateral vestibular deficit present for more than 6 months, confirmed with videonystagmography and vestibular evoked myogenic potential testing. Statistical analysis was performed from July 7, 2021, to January 25, 2022. Twelve twice-weekly sessions of posturography-assisted vestibular retraining with prescribed weight shifting tasks guided by an interactive display. Change in scores on the Dizziness Handicap Inventory (DHI), the Activities-Specific Balance Confidence (ABC) Scale, and the Falls Efficacy Scale-International (FES-I), which participants completed before and after retraining to measure their perception of their disability. They also completed posturography measurements. Secondary outcomes included tolerability of the intervention and rate of completion of the full protocol. A total of 13 participants (8 men [62%]; median age, 51 years [range, 18-67 years]) were enrolled. All 13 participants completed the intervention and all follow-up. After treatment, the median changes in scores were -16 points (95% CI, -20 to 2) for the DHI, -9 (95% CI, -14 to 1) for the FES-I, and 11.9 (95% CI, 0-17.3) for the ABC Scale. Eight participants (62%) improved by greater than the minimum clinically important difference (MCID) for the DHI, whereas 4 (31%) exceeded the MCID for the ABC Scale, and 3 (23%) exceeded the MCID for the FES-I. Participants with moderate to severe disability at baseline (n = 7) had a larger magnitude of improvement in DHI scores than those with mild disability (n = 6) (-18 [95% CI, -78 to 2] vs -1 [95% CI, -8 to 16]). Six of the 7 patients (86%) with moderate to severe disability improved by greater than the MCID for DHI, wherease 4 of 7 patients (57%) improved by greater than the MCID for the ABC Scale, and 3 of 7 patients (43%) improved by greater than the MCID for the FES-I. This cohort study suggests that computerized, dynamic posturography-assisted retraining was associated with clinically meaningful improvements in participant-reported disability among those with stable unilateral vestibular deficit and moderate to severe disability. Further studies should compare posturography-assisted vestibular retraining with conventional physical therapy rehabilitation techniques. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04875013.