Patient Perception of Mental Effort in Voice Therapy

Abstract

ObjectiveOne challenge in voice therapy is that mastering new vocal techniques is inherently cognitively effortful. While effort is critical for learning, it can also lead to frustration and reduced patient engagement. The purpose of this study was to investigate the relationship between patient-perception of voice handicap and mental effort in voice therapy, and to determine if different therapy approaches and stimuli elicit different perceptions of mental effort. MethodsA non-experimental, prospective investigation was conducted with adult patients receiving voice therapy. Prior to therapy initiation, patients completed the Voice Handicap Index-10 (VHI-10) to quantify perceived severity of their voice disorders. To assess mental effort, a Borg mental effort scale and the NASA Task Load Index (NASA-TLX) were administered following each therapy session. Therapy type and treatment stimulus/level of treatment hierarchy was documented for each session. Kruskal-Wallis H-test was used to compare differences in baseline VHI-10 and mental effort among voice disorder diagnoses. Pairwise comparisons, linear random-intercept mixed-effects model, and generalized estimating equation method were used to determine correlation between VHI-10 and mental effort, and therapy type, stimulus, and effort. ResultsTwenty-seven participants (89% female, 60% white) completed the study. There was no significant difference in VHI-10 or baseline perceptions of mental effort between races or among voice disorder diagnoses. There was a significant positive correlation between VHI-10 scores and session 1 mental effort. There was no significant difference in effort ratings among therapy types, but effort was rated as significantly greater for therapy stimuli that involved connected speech practice than other stimuli. Perceived mental effort significantly decreased over time. DiscussionVoice therapy imposes a cognitive load on the patient, and is particularly challenging for individuals with more severely perceived voice disorders. Further, patients think voice treatment approaches that utilize connected speech stimuli are more effortful than those that use simple stimuli, regardless of treatment target (e.g. resonance, flow).