Patient interviews in interprofessional and intercultural contexts (PinKo) - project report on interdisciplinary competence development in students of medicine, pharmacy, and community interpreting.

Abstract

Background: Hospitals and other medical institutions must prepare for a further increase in patients who are either immigrants or Germans with a migration background. In spite of the unquestionable educational and socio-political relevance of this topic, most German universities do not offer a comprehensive curriculum aimed at increasing intercultural awareness and putting it into practice in the training of students in medicine and pharmacy. Against this background, this article presents the innovative teaching project “Die Triade”, which was jointly implemented by the Departments of Medicine, Pharmacy and Translation Studies at the University of Mainz.Aim: The aim is to give an overview of the development, realisation, implementation and consolidation of the course “Patient interviews in interprofessional and intercultural contexts” (PinKo), which was designed in the project “Die Triade”.Project description: A two-day course was developed, starting with a block session for all participating students to teach the basics of interprofessional and intercultural competence development. On the second practical training day, students learn and practice triadic conversation in different language groups using scripted roles. While the trainee doctors and pharmacists represent their respective professions in the prepared conversational situations, the interpreting students take on the roles of interpreters and patients. The event is jointly supervised by lecturers from the participating professions and language groups.Results: In the 2016 summer semester and the following winter semester, the course was organised for a total of 112 students. The event as a whole was evaluated by means of a questionnaire by the students of the participating departments (Medicine (M) N=8, Pharmacy (P) N=60; Translation (T) N=44). Overall, the event was rated as good (1=very good, 6=insufficient) ((M) 1.67/2.00; (P) 2.29/3.33; (T) 1.50/1.86). The course tended to be rated lower by pharmacy students; this also applies to the rating of the development of interprofessional competences ((M) 1.33/2.00, (P) 2.00/2.93, (T) 1.82/2.25). Discussion: The course is suitable for the acquisition of interprofessional as well as intercultural competences. However, in order to improve the course in a participant-centred way, train larger numbers of participants and include additional healthcare occupations such as nursing or assistant medical professions, adaptations of the concept would be necessary. In this context, the digitalisation of the learning content appears to be particularly useful for ensuring that the course can be adapted to heterogeneous groups of participants and to optimise in-person times for further opportunities for practice.