Abstract

1117 Background: The percentage of women undergoing contralateral prophylactic mastectomy (CPM) has more than doubled in recent years. The underlying reasons patients choose CPM have not been fully evaluated. Our objective was to survey patients who have undergone a unilateral mastectomy with or without CPM to identify reasons surrounding their decisions. Methods: After obtaining IRB approval, a 30-question cross-sectional validated survey was mailed to 691 patients who underwent mastectomy from 1972 to 2011 and are receiving treatment or surveillance at City of Hope. The questionnaire queried the factors behind the choice of surgery for each patient. Demographic questions were included and patient charts were also reviewed. Results: The overall response rate was 53% (N=368). Patients were classified into those who underwent mastectomy with CPM (N=139, 38%) and those who underwent mastectomy without CPM (no-CPM) (N=229, 62%). Of returned surveys, the median age was 50; 24% of patients reported a family history of breast cancer (42% CPM vs. 13% no-CPM, p<0.0001) and 80% of patients had education beyond the high school level (87% CPM vs. 77% no-CPM, p=0.013). PM patients reported being “very concerned” about breast cancer more often than no-CPM patients (46% vs. 34%, p=0.033).The primary reasons for CPM were: concern of recurrence (55%), cosmetic symmetry (27%), physician recommendation (17%), and unclear pre-operative imaging (9%). When questioned about regrets, the top response was decreased sensation (26%). Although 81% of CPM patients were “very satisfied” with their decision, 32% of no-CPM patients reported the same level of satisfaction with their decision (p<0.0001). For no-CPM patients, the primary reasons for the choice of no-CPM was physician advice and “monitoring is sufficient”; with 18% of the responders still considering a CPM. Conclusions: Patients’ perceived risk of contralateral breast cancer is the primary reason for CPM. CPM patients tend to be more satisfied with their decision compared to no-CPM patients. This may be related to the active decision-making thought processes and education necessary to choose CPM. Further patient education is warranted to minimize the risk of regret in making this decision.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call