Abstract
IntroductionFirearm injury prevention discussions with emergency department (ED) patients provide a unique opportunity to prevent death and injury in high-risk patient groups. Building mutual understanding of safe firearm practices between patients and providers will aid the development of effective interventions. Examining ED patient baseline characteristics, perspectives on healthcare-based safety discussions, and experience with and access to firearms, will allow practitioners to craft more effective messaging and interventions.MethodsUsing an institutional review board-approved cross-sectional survey modified from a validated national instrument, we recruited 625 patients from three large, urban, academically affiliated EDs in the South to assess patient baseline characteristics, perspectives regarding firearms and firearm safety discussions, and prior violence history, as well as firearm access and safety habits. We compared the degree to which patients were open to discussions regarding firearms across a variety of provider types and clinical scenarios between those with and without gun access.ResultsOf the 625 patients consented and eligible for the study, 306 had access to firearms. The patients with firearm access were predominantly male, were more likely to have military experience, live in an urban or suburban region, and have experienced prior violence when compared to those without firearm access. Patients with and without gun access view firearm safety discussions with their healthcare provider as acceptable and analogous to other behavioral health interventions (i.e., helmet/seat belt use, alcohol/cigarette use). Patients were also accepting of these firearm safety discussions in many clinical contexts and led by multiple provider types. Of the patients with gun access, storage of each type of firearm was reviewed and the primary reason for ownership was for personal protection across all firearm types.ConclusionPatients in the ED indicate openness to firearm safety discussions delivered by a variety of providers and in diverse clinical scenarios. Healthcare providers engaging firearm owners in appropriate risk-benefit discussions using a trauma-informed approach is a critical next step in research and intervention.
Highlights
Firearm injury prevention discussions with emergency department (ED) patients provide a unique opportunity to prevent death and injury in high-risk patient groups
Patients were accepting of these firearm safety discussions in many clinical contexts and led by multiple provider types
Patients in the ED indicate openness to firearm safety discussions delivered by a variety of providers and in diverse clinical scenarios
Summary
The 2015 National Firearm Survey (NFS) used a nationally representative, web-based sample to estimate that 54.7 million people in the US own guns.[9] two-thirds of non-firearm owners and over one-half of firearm owners felt it is “at least sometimes appropriate” for physicians and other healthcare providers to discuss firearm safety with patients.[10] Another study using the NFS sample examined the responses of veterans They concluded that half of veterans own at least one firearm, with the majority owning both handguns and long guns, citing personal protection as the primary reason for ownership.[11] These findings provide an important glimpse into firearm ownership and potential translational healthcare applications. Assessing patients’ degree of openness to firearm discussions with different healthcare provider types in specific clinical scenarios is an important step in firearm injury prevention research
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have