Patient characteristics and periprocedural outcomes of percutaneous coronary intervention of the left main coronary artery

Abstract

Abstract Funding Acknowledgements Type of funding sources: None. Introduction Left main (LM) disease is found in 5 to 6% of all coronary angiograms. Revascularization has a class IA recommendation, but the choice of the revascularization method whether by coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) or percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is currently under debate. The selection depends on patient’s characteristics (age, sex, comorbidities, frailty), as well as anatomical considerations. We aim to describe the patients with LM disease that were treated with PCI and report their short-term outcomes in a tertiary center. Methods Single-center retrospective study including all patients who underwent LM PCI from 2013 to 2019. The basal characteristics were retrieved from the electronic medical records. Acute kidney injury was defined as an absolute increase in serum creatinine of ≥ 0.3 mg/dL or ≥ 1.5-fold from baseline. Type IVa myocardial infarction was assessed by the Third Universal Definition. Results A total of 110 procedures were performed during the study period (table 1). Most of the patients were male, with a median age of 61 years. A considerable number of patients showed a reduced ejection fraction (41.2%). The left main lesions were most frequently distal and associated with left anterior descending artery disease. Radial access was used in a minority of cases (33.6%), although most were IVUS-guided (93.6%). Complete revascularization was achieved in 55.5%. The number of procedures over time is depicted in figure 1. There was only 1 death (0.9%) during index hospitalization. There was a high incidence of type IVa myocardial infarction (19.1%) and acute kidney injury (10%), and a low incidence of TIMI major bleeding (1.8%). Conclusion Current practice shows an increase of left main PCI over time, particularly from 2016, after the EXCEL trial results were published. This can be due to improved technical aspects such as IVUS guidance, which was used in most patients. Noticeable, almost half of the patients had a reduced ejection fraction. Although there was a very low short-term mortality associated with the procedure (1%), as well as a low bleeding risk (4.8%), there was a high incidence of type IVa myocardial infarction (20.2%). Only 55.5% archived a complete revascularization. Despite promising immediate results in clinical practice, long term follow up will be essential to determine the future role of left main PCI.