Patient-centeredness in psychiatric work disability evaluations and the reproducibility of work capacity estimates

Abstract

ObjectivesTo evaluate the extent of patient-centeredness in psychiatric work disability evaluations and its association with the reproducibility of work capacity (WC) estimates. MethodsIn our mixed methods study, 29 video-taped interviews conducted in psychiatric work disability evaluations were coded with the Roter Interaction Analysis System (RIAS) and different measures of patient-centeredness were derived from these codings, including a summary patient-centred communication ratio. Four experts each estimated a claimant’s WC on a scale from 0% to 100%. ResultsPatient-centred communication ratios were always >1, suggesting a preponderance of psychosocial information exchange. In contrast, utterances reflecting empathy were rare e.g., the expert did not address the claimant’s emotions in 25 of 29 interviews. None of the derived patient-centeredness measures showed a significant association with WC reproducibility. ConclusionsMany of the experts’ questions addressed the claimant’s lifestyle and psychosocial situation. However, this likely reflected factual requirements for the expert opinion, rather than patient-centeredness. Indeed, the experts rarely showed empathy, which is a hallmark characteristic of patient-centeredness. The reproducibility of work capacity estimates was not modulated by patient-centeredness, irrespective of its quantification. Practice implicationsPatient-centeredness in work disability evaluations should find its entry in continuing education of experts.