Abstract

Background. The aim of this longitudinal observational study was to evaluate patients’ perceptions of alignment changes during the first stage of fixed orthodontic treatment. Methods. Ninety-three non-extraction patients (mean age: 17.6 years) who were scheduled to undergo fixed-appliance treatment in the first author's private office were included. Patients assessed the alignment of their teeth subjectively using visual analogue scale at the bonding session and four, eight and 12 weeks later. The amount of Little's irregularity index at each session was calculated on stone casts. Freidman test was used to compare the "alignment changes" between different intervals. Correlation coefficients were calculated using Spearman test between Little’s irregularity indices and alignment scores reported by the patients in each session. Results. No patients reported regression in alignment changes during three-month course of treatment. The final changes (from bonding session to the 12th-week visit) were smaller than the sum of the three intervals, which indicated that patients became more perceptive as the treatment progressed. Comparison of two scores reported for each session (in the same session and in the next session) revealed that patients could not recall their previous situation well. Patients do not perceive alignment changes in the same way as clinicians. Furthermore, patients who were 16 or older perceived smaller alignment changes during the first four-week period and smaller final alignment changes. Conclusion. To obtain better patient compliance and improve their motivation throughout orthodontic treatment, patientspecific measures should be undertaken, including reminding them about their initial conditions and highlighting the changes as the treatment progresses.

Highlights

  • Oral health is defined as “a comfortable and functional dentition, which allows individuals to continue in their desired social role.”[1]

  • The final changes were smaller than the sum of the three intervals, which indicated that patients became more perceptive as the treatment progressed

  • A study assessing how orthodontic research outcomes reflect patient values found that this fact was overlooked in most of the studies and that the evaluation of treatment outcomes was mostly clinician-centered.[13]

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Oral health is defined as “a comfortable and functional dentition, which allows individuals to continue in their desired social role.”[1]. Patients’ expectations affect their evaluation of the quality of treatment and their satisfaction with treatment outcomes.[10] They evaluate treatment efficacy by comparing their expectations with the real outcomes.[11] If a patient's expectations are not met, it might cause dissatisfaction, resulting in failure to achieve professional success.[11,12]. The aim of this longitudinal observational study was to evaluate patients’ perceptions of alignment changes during the first stage of fixed orthodontic treatment

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.