Abstract

IntroductionThe capability of glucometer internal quality control (QC) in detecting varying magnitude of systematic error (bias), and the potential use of moving sum of positive results (MovSum) and moving average (MA) techniques as potential alternatives were evaluated.Materials and methodsThe probability of error detection using routine QC and manufacturer’s control limits were investigated using historical data. Moving sum of positive results and MA algorithms were developed and optimized before being evaluated through numerical simulation for false positive rate and probability of error detection.ResultsWhen the manufacturer’s default control limits (that are multiple times higher than the running standard deviation (SD) of the glucometer) was used, they had 0-75% probability of detecting small errors up to 0.8 mmol/L. However, the error detection capability improved to 20-100% when the running SD of the glucometer was used. At a binarization threshold of 6.2 mmol/L and block sizes of 200 to 400, MovSum has a 100% probability of detecting a bias that is greater than 0.5 mmol/L. Compared to MovSum, the MA technique had lower probability of bias detection, especially for smaller bias magnitudes; MA also had higher false positive rates.ConclusionsThe MovSum technique is suited for detecting small, but clinically significant biases. Point of care QC should follow conventional practice by setting the control limits according to the running mean and SD to allow proper error detection. The glucometer manufacturers have an active role to play in liberalizing QC settings and also enhancing the middleware to facility patient-based QC practices.

Highlights

  • The capability of glucometer internal quality control (QC) in detecting varying magnitude of systematic error, and the potential use of moving sum of positive results (MovSum) and moving average (MA) techniques as potential alternatives were evaluated

  • When the QC range provided by the manufacturer was used as the control limits, they had 0-75% probability of detecting small errors up to 0.8 mmol/L

  • The asymmetry in the probability of error detection between the upper and lower control limit is due to the difference between the QC target and the mean of the running QC measurement, as would be present in a real-world scenario

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The capability of glucometer internal quality control (QC) in detecting varying magnitude of systematic error (bias), and the potential use of moving sum of positive results (MovSum) and moving average (MA) techniques as potential alternatives were evaluated. Ensuring this result harmonization can be achieved by performing pre-deployment instrument evaluation, relevant training and ongoing competency certification of performing staff, establishing an internal quality control (QC) and proficiency testing system, and having laboratory oversight [1,2,3,4]. The QC testing on glucometer is performed using at least two concentrations of reference materials

Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.