Abstract

Estimates of the rate and risk-factors for difficult airway rarely include a denominator for the number of anaesthetics. Approaches such as self-reporting and crowd-sourcing of airway incidents may help identify specific lessons from clinical episodes, but the lack of denominator data, biased reporting and under-reporting does not allow a comprehensive population-based assessment. We used an established state-wide dataset to determine the incidence of failed and difficult intubations between 2015 and 2017 in the state of Victoria in Australia, along with associated patient and surgical risk-factors. A total of 861,533 general anaesthesia episodes were analysed. Of these, 4092 patients with difficult or failed intubation were identified; incidence rates of 0.52% (2015-2016) and 0.43% (2016-2017), respectively. Difficult/failed intubations were most common in patients aged 45-75 and decreased for older age groups, with risk being lower for patients aged>85 than patients aged 35-44. The risk for failed/difficult intubation increased significantly for: patients undergoing emergency surgery (OR 1.80); obese patients (OR 2.48); increased ASA physical status; and increased Charlson Comorbidity Index. Across all age groups, procedures on the nervous system (OR 1.92) and endocrine system (OR 2.03) had the highest risk of failed/difficult intubation. The relative reduced risk for failed/difficult intubations in the elderly population is a novel finding that contrasts with previous research and may suggest a 'compression of morbidity' effect as a moderator. Administrative databases have the potential to improve understanding of peri-operative risk of rare events at a population level.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.