Abstract

IMPORTANCEUnexpected complications in term newborns have been recently adopted by the Joint Commission as a marker of obstetric care quality.OBJECTIVETo understand the variation and patient and hospital factors associated with severe unexpected complications in term neonates among hospitals in the United States.DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTSThis cross-sectional study collected data from all births in US counties with 1 obstetric hospital using county-identified birth certificate data and American Hospital Association annual survey data from January 1, 2015, through December 31, 2017. All live-born, term, singleton infants weighing at least 2500 g were included. The data analysis was performed from December 1, 2018, through June 30, 2019.EXPOSURESSevere unexpected newborn complication, defined as neonatal death, 5-minute Apgar score of 3 or less, seizure, use of assisted ventilation for at least 6 hours, or transfer to another facility.MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURESBetween-hospital variation and patient and hospital factors associated with unexpected newborn complications.RESULTSA total of 1 754 852 births from 576 hospitals were included in the analysis. A wide range of hospital complication rates was found (range, 0.6–89.9 per 1000 births; median, 15.3 per 1000 births [interquartile range, 9.6–22.0 per 1000 births]). Hospitals with high newborn complication rates were more likely to care for younger, white, less educated, and publicly insured women with more medical comorbidities compared with hospitals with low complication rates. In the adjusted models, there was little effect of case mix to explain the observed between-county variation (11.3%; 95% CI, 10.0%−12.6%). Neonatal transfer was the primary factor associated with complication rates, especially among hospitals with the highest rates (66.0% of all complications). The risk for unexpected neonatal complication increased by more than 50% for those neonates born at hospitals without a neonatal intensive care unit compared with those with a neonatal intensive care unit (adjusted odds ratio, 1.55; 95% CI, 1.38–1.75).CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCEIn this study, severe unexpected complication rates among term newborns varied widely. When included in the metric numerator, neonatal transfer was the primary factor associated with complications, especially among hospitals with the highest rates. Transfers were more likely to be necessary when infants were born in hospitals with lower levels of neonatal care. Thus, if this metric is to be used in its current form, it would appear that accreditors, regulatory bodies, and payers should consider adjusting for or stratifying by a hospital’s level of neonatal care to avoid disincentivizing against appropriate transfers.

Highlights

  • In obstetrics, 2 patients have outcomes resulting from the process of labor and delivery: mother and infant

  • The risk for unexpected neonatal complication increased by more than 50% for those neonates born at hospitals without a neonatal intensive care unit compared with those with a neonatal intensive care unit

  • When included in the metric numerator, neonatal transfer was the primary factor associated with complications, especially among hospitals with the highest rates

Read more

Summary

Introduction

2 patients have outcomes resulting from the process of labor and delivery: mother and infant. Examples of proposed and adopted hospital measures of obstetric care include rates of cesarean delivery, episiotomy, higher-order perineal laceration, trial of labor after cesarean delivery, and postpartum readmissions.[1,2,3,4,5,6,7] Of these, the cesarean delivery rate has been studied extensively and widely adopted and endorsed as an important quality metric based on the idea that overuse of cesarean delivery unnecessarily exposes more women to the risks of surgical complications and affects their risks in subsequent pregnancies. The most widely adopted obstetric quality metric aimed at reducing neonatal morbidity is avoidance of elective delivery before 39 weeks.[8,9] In 2011, the California Maternal Quality Care Collaborative developed a novel neonatal metric to serve as a balancing measure to more maternal-focused metrics of intrapartum care.[10] This metric, Unexpected Complications in Term Newborns, captures adverse neonatal conditions that may be associated with labor and delivery management. This measure has been proposed to serve as a balancing measure to maternal metrics, such as the rate of nulliparous, term, singleton, vertex-presenting cesarean deliveries.[11,12,13,14,15,16,17]

Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call