Abstract

BackgroundRecruitment of pediatric participants in studies is difficult due to the vulnerability of this population and the scarcity of certain conditions. Co-enrolling in multiple studies is a strategy that may help overcome this problem. Although anecdotal evidence suggests that co-enrollment may increase patient and caregiver burden, few studies have been conducted from the patient perspective. The objective of this quality improvement project was to elicit patient and caregiver opinions on co-enrolling in multiple research studies.MethodsPatients and caregivers attending the rheumatology clinic at The Hospital for Sick Children were invited to participate in a semi-structured interview or focus group session. Participants were asked to respond to ten prompts, organized into five categories: experience in clinical research, multiple studies, study selection, study timing and other comments. Sessions were recorded, transcribed and analyzed using NVivo 10 to identify common themes.ResultsOverall, eighteen caregivers and two patients were included in the study. Participants felt that the level of study involvement, rather than the number of studies, was the biggest factor affecting their decision to participate. Another factor commonly identified was the competing demands of participants’ work and family life. Participants indicated that they generally preferred to be informed about all study opportunities and liked to receive this information prior to their appointments. Once informed, they preferred to be approached by the research team while they were waiting for their appointment.ConclusionPatients and caregivers are open to the concept of co-enrolling in multiple research studies. There are multiple factors which influence decisions to co-enroll in studies including the demands of the study and personal limitations. These findings will help guide the design and practices of future research.

Highlights

  • Recruitment of pediatric participants in studies is difficult due to the vulnerability of this population and the scarcity of certain conditions

  • Research in the area of co-enrollment has traditionally been based in critical care or intensive care unit (ICU) settings [2, 4,5,6]

  • This was a random and unsupported cutoff number. We began this project to help inform our local practices, and to provide evidence to support the development of policies about coenrollment. The objective of this project was to identify patients’ and caregivers’ preferences for co-enrollment in pediatric research, as well as understand factors that affect their decision to participate in multiple studies

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Recruitment of pediatric participants in studies is difficult due to the vulnerability of this population and the scarcity of certain conditions. Anecdotal evidence suggests that co-enrollment may increase patient and caregiver burden, few studies have been conducted from the patient perspective The objective of this quality improvement project was to elicit patient and caregiver opinions on co-enrolling in multiple research studies. The literature has described a range of strategies including limiting the number of times an individual is approached for studies, allowing co-enrollment with restrictions, and prohibiting co-enrollment [2, 4]. The rationale behind these guidelines as well as their impact are not clear. Limiting the number of studies which are presented to patients impacts their autonomy to make decisions [3, 5, 8]

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.