Abstract

Marine conservation sciences have traditionally been, and remain, non-diverse work environments with many barriers to justice, equity, diversity, and inclusion (JEDI). These barriers disproportionately affect entry of early career scientists and practitioners and limit the success of marine conservation professionals from under-represented, marginalized, and overburdened groups. These groups specifically include women, LGBTQ+, Black, Indigenous, and people of color (BIPOC). However, the issues also arise from the global North/South and East/West divide with under-representation of scientists from the South and East in the global marine conservation and science arena. Persisting inequities in conservation, along with a lack of inclusiveness and diversity, also limit opportunities for innovation, cross-cultural knowledge exchange, and effective implementation of conservation and management policies. As part of its mandate to increase diversity and promote inclusion of underrepresented groups, the Diversity and Inclusion committee of the Society for Conservation Biology-Marine Section (SCB Marine) organized a JEDI focus group at the Sixth International Marine Conservation Congress (IMCC6) which was held virtually. The focus group included a portion of the global cohort of IMCC6 attendees who identified issues affecting JEDI in marine conservation and explored pathways to address those issues. Therefore, the barriers and pathways identified here focus on issues pertinent to participants’ global regions and experiences. Several barriers to just, equitable, diverse, and inclusive conservation science and practice were identified. Examples included limited participation of under-represented minorities (URM) in research networks, editorial biases against URM, limited professional development and engagement opportunities for URM and non-English speakers, barriers to inclusion of women, LGBTQ+, and sensory impaired individuals, and financial barriers to inclusion of URM in all aspects of marine conservation and research. In the current policy brief, we explore these barriers, assess how they limit progress in marine conservation research and practice, and seek to identify initiatives for improvements. We expect the initiatives discussed here to advances practices rooted in principles of JEDI, within SCB Marine and, the broader conservation community. The recommendations and perspectives herein broadly apply to conservation science and practice, and are critical to effective and sustainable conservation and management outcomes.

Highlights

  • The lack of diversity in marine sciences and conservation has existed for a while, its extent, specific causes and impacts are being characterized more recently by scholars and practitioners globally

  • The first part of FG1 included introductions from all participants and enabled a discussion of barriers to JEDI in marine conservation experienced by participants and anyone willing to share their experiences could contribute

  • Examples of barriers raised during the focus groups included limited participation of underrepresented minorities (URM) in research networks, editorial biases against URM, limited professional development and engagement opportunities for URM and nonEnglish speakers, barriers to inclusion of women, LGBTQ+, and sensory impaired individuals, and financial barriers to inclusion of URM in all aspects of marine conservation and research

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The lack of diversity in marine sciences and conservation has existed for a while, its extent, specific causes and impacts are being characterized more recently by scholars and practitioners globally. Overcoming this lack of diversity triggered by systemic inequities and exclusion remains complex and overdue, and can only be achieved by first identifying causative factors and potential pathways to resolution of each. A lack of diversity at the leadership level is often due to an absence of support systems for URM individuals, leading to systemic effects of a non-inclusive and unempathetic environment. URMs largely remain URMs with no upward mobility over time

Methods
Findings
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call