Abstract
Abstract Despite widespread democratic support for continued participation in the Paris Agreement, U.S. President Donald Trump decided to withdraw from it in June 2017. The decision signaled a democratic dysfunction in the face of climate change, one that will likely hold negative consequences for communities exposed and vulnerable to the effects of continued fossil fuel use and climate change. This article argues that Trump's decision opens 4 “pathways” by which these harms might be transmitted in the coming years: (1) by prolonging the viability of U.S. fossil fuel development; (2) by prolonging a period of slow and unambitious global climate action; (3) by extending to climate efforts a worldview that will open future climate policy up to reactionary resistance; and (4) by rescinding funding for adaptation projects in vulnerable communities.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.