Abstract
BackgroundThe use of multidimensional poverty measures is becoming more common for measuring the living standards of older people. However, the pathways into poverty are relatively unknown, nor is it known how this affects the length of time people are in poverty for.MethodsUsing Waves 1 to 12 of the nationally representative Household, Income and Labour Dynamics in Australia (HILDA) survey, longitudinal analysis was undertaken to identify the order that key forms of disadvantage develop – poor health, low income and insufficient education attainment – amongst Australians aged 65 years and over in multidimensional poverty, and the relationship this has with chronic poverty. Path analysis and linear regression models were used.ResultsFor all older people with at least a Year 10 level of education attainment earlier mental health was significantly related to later household income (p = 0.001) and wealth (p = 0.017). For all older people with at less than a Year 10 level of education attainment earlier household income was significantly related to later mental health (p = 0.021).When limited to those in multidimensional poverty who were in income poverty and also had poor health, older people generally fell into income poverty first and then developed poor health.The order in which income poverty and poor health were developed had a significant influence on the length of time older people with less than a Year 10 level of education attainment were in multidimensional poverty for. Those who developed poor health first then fell into income poverty spend significantly less time in multidimensional poverty (−4.90, p < .0001) than those who fell into income poverty then developed poor health.ConclusionKnowing the order that different forms of disadvantage develop, and the influence this has on poverty entrenchment, is of use to policy makers wishing to provide interventions to prevent older people being in long-term multidimensional poverty.
Highlights
The use of multidimensional poverty measures is becoming more common for measuring the living standards of older people
There was no evidence of a significant relationship between earlier household income or wealth and later physical health or mental health, and earlier physical health and later household income or wealth
There was no evidence of a significant relationship between earlier household income or wealth and later physical health, and earlier physical or mental health and later income or wealth
Summary
The use of multidimensional poverty measures is becoming more common for measuring the living standards of older people. This paper aims to assess the different pathways into multidimensional poverty amongst older people using the Freedom Poverty Measure, a multidimensional measure of poverty developed for the Australian population It assesses health, education and income to determine an individual’s poverty status [19, 20]. In constructing the Freedom Poverty Measure, income, health and education were chosen as the dimensions of disadvantage for their demonstrated impact on the living standards of individuals [21,22,23,24,25,26,27,28,29,30]. The paper focuses upon those aged 55 years and over in Australia
Sign-in/Register to view highlights & summary Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Free) 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a call
