Abstract

Introduction: Pathological nipple discharge is usually of benign aetiology but cancer may be the underlying cause in up to 20% of the presentations. The diagnostic value of discharge cytology and significance of presence of blood remains a topic of interest. Our study sets out to review the distribution of histopathology and diagnostic application of blood-staining and cytology in pathological nipple discharge. Methods: We performed a retrospective analysis of those patients that had surgery for pathological nipple discharge. The hospital's electronic medical records and breast cancer information systems were used to identify our study cohort. Parameters evaluated included patient demographics, radiological assessment, if discharge was blood-stained and histological/cytological analysis. Results: Of 123 patients, intraductal papilloma was the leading diagnosis (�� = 62) followed by duct ectasia (�� = 34). Carcinoma in-situ and invasive carcinoma occurred in nine cases. Seventy-one patients presented with blood-stained nipple discharge of which 41 had a diagnosis of intraductal papilloma, 17 had duct ectasia, and seven cases were due to carcinoma. Two cases of cancer were negative for blood. Cytology was done only in 23 patients and was not diagnostic of carcinoma and identified intraductal papilloma in only 3 cases. Conclusion: This study supports the generally accepted view that cytology has very poor sensitivity for detecting breast cancer and has therefore very limited diagnostic value. Nipple discharge that is negative for blood is still associated with cancer. It also confirms that intraductal papilloma is the leading cause of pathological nipple discharge.

Highlights

  • Pathological nipple discharge is usually of benign aetiology but cancer may be the underlying cause in up to 20% of the presentations

  • Until 2010 the consensus was that all women with pathological nipple discharge (PND) should have mammography if they were over the age of 35 years in order to identify ipsilateral lesions [11]

  • Ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) was diagnosed in 5.7% of cases (n = 7) that presented with PND while invasive carcinoma was diagnosed in 1.6% of patients (n = 2)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Pathological nipple discharge is usually of benign aetiology but cancer may be the underlying cause in up to 20% of the presentations. Our study sets out to review the distribution of histopathology and diagnostic application of blood-staining and cytology in pathological nipple discharge. Seventy-one patients presented with blood-stained nipple discharge of which 41 had a diagnosis of intraductal papilloma, 17 had duct ectasia, and seven cases were due to carcinoma. Cytology was done only in 23 patients and was not diagnostic of carcinoma and identified intraductal papilloma in only 3 cases. While the commonest cause of PND is intraductal papilloma (IDP), responsible for nearly 40% of cases [3], an underlying malignancy, usually ductal carcinoma in-situ (DCIS), has a reported incidence of 4-20% [6,7,8,9].

Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call