Pathological complete response rate and clinical outcome after neoadjuvant therapy of HER2-low breast cancer: A National Cancer Database Analysis

Abstract

BackgroundThe interest in breast cancer with low HER2 expression as a distinct subtype is increasing. We aimed to explore the differences between HER2-low and HER2-zero breast cancer in their prognosis and rate of pathological complete response (pCR) after neoadjuvant therapy. MethodsThe National Cancer Database (NCDB) was used to select patients with breast cancer who received neoadjuvant therapy from 2004 to 2017. Logistic regression model was constructed for analysis of pCR. Cox proportional hazards regression model and Kaplan–Meier method were used for survival analysis. ResultsA total of 41500 breast cancer patients were included, among which 14814 (35.7%) had HER2-zero tumors and 26686 (64.3%) had HER2-low. HER2-low tumors were more commonly HR-positive in comparison with HER2-zero (66.3% versus 47.1%, P < 0.001). A lower rate of pCR was observed in HER2-low tumors than in HER2-zero tumors after neoadjuvant therapy in the total cohort (OR = 0.90; 95% CI [0.86–0.95]; P < 0.001) and in the subset of HR-positive (OR = 0.87; 95% CI [0.81–0.94]; P < 0.001). Patients with HER2-low tumors had a significantly superior survival than those with HER2-zero tumors (HR = 0.90; 95% CI [0.86–0.94]; P < 0.001), regardless of the HR status. Additionally, a marginal survival difference was also observed between HER2 IHC1+ and HER2 IHC2+/ISH-negative (HR = 0.91; 95% CI [0.85–0.97]; P = 0.003) cohorts. ConclusionHER2-low tumors are a clinically relevant breast cancer subtype that is distinct from HER2-zero tumors. These findings may provide clues to appropriate therapeutic strategies for this subtype in the future.