Abstract

224 Background: The current guidelines recommend the resection of all visible residual tumors in NSGCT after a cisplatin based chemotherapy. There are controversial data concerning the necessity of PC-RPLND in patients with residual tumours less than one centimetre in diameter. The aim of our study was to evaluate the pathological findings in a modern series with regard of the residual tumour size. Methods: A retrospective analysis of the patient's charts was performed including patients who underwent PC-RPLND between 1989 and 2010. Of 408 patients 330 had a NSGCT, 78 patients had a pure seminoma or a primary extragonadal germ cell cancer and were excluded from analysis. The tumour size at the time of surgery was available in 261 patients in the remaining 69 pateints no preopretive data with regard to the tumour size were recorded in the radiology reports. Due to the location of the residual tumour a median laparotomy, a thoracoabdominal approach was used. In one center a laparoscopic approach was preferred. Results: Mean tumour diameter was 4.7 (0 to 32) cm. The patients were stratified in three groups: group 1 n=28 (RT<=1cm), group 2 n=23 (RT>1<=1.5cm) and group 3 n=209 (RT>1.5cm). The histological specimens contained teratoma in 21.4%, 39.1%, 44.5% respectively, viable cancer in 10.7%, 17.4% and 22% respectively, and fibrosis/necrosis in 64.3%, 52.2% and 37.8% respectively in the three grpups respectively. Conclusions: The finding of both teratoma and viable cancer decreases with decreasing sizes of the residual tumour. Nevertheless lesions <= than 1 cm still harbour a significant pathohistology in one third of the patients. As a consequence PC-RPLND must not be omitted even in small RT. No significant financial relationships to disclose.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call