Abstract

In this paper a method has been proposed to identify the lowest cost path to reach a destination point from a source point. However, unlike most of the colloquial graph traversal problems, here the destination point is dynamic— not fixed, i.e. changes its position with time. This causes the chaser to update its path planning accordingly, by constantly sensing the position of the destination. During the progression, the chaser may has to side-track many obstacles, for which, in addition to the algorithm for reaching dynamic target through optimal path, two techniques have also been proposed for avoiding obstacles. The proposed method has been compared with the existing techniques for reaching dynamic target such as D*, D* Lite etc. and also with the existing obstacle avoidance techniques such as Bug, NHNA etc., mainly used in Robotics.

Highlights

  • In GIS finding shortest [3] path between two points plays a very important role

  • There exists a number of graph search techniques for finding optimal path to reach a dynamic target

  • The main motto of the proposed technique is to achieve a dynamic target i.e. a target which changes its position over time, by traversing as shortest distance as possible

Read more

Summary

INTRODUCTION

In GIS finding shortest (or least cost on the basis of influencing criteria) [3] path between two points plays a very important role. In addition to path planning, the robot has to side-track the existing obstacles [1][2][4][5]. The target point may be dynamic (e.g. to track a pirate ship, to chase a wounded animal adorned with radio collaretc.). During planning for shortest path, existing obstacles should be avoided. In this proposed method, two obstacle avoidance techniques, namely — Iterative Recovery Method and Shortest Leap Method; have been proposed. A number of existing algorithms both for dynamic target search and obstacle avoidance are been studied along with their demerits and the proposed technique tries to overcome them

RELATED WORKS
THE SCHEME
Shortest Leap Method to avoid Obstacles
Iterative Recovery Method to avoid Obstacles
IMPLEMENTATION AND RESULTS
ANALYSIS AND COMPARISON
Method
CONCLUSION
VIII. REFERENCES
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.