Abstract
In this literature review to compare the process to develop a suitable process for public scoping in health impact assessment, which found that the PATH and the Deliberative Opinion Poll are suitable to be developed for use by the public scoping process. The PATH is a process-oriented quality data. It helps to understand the community context deeply, the relationship between cultural traditions, community resources and valuable resource comments on the project and concerns on the impact that will affect your health. In the process of deliberative opinion poll is a process that allows for the acquisition of quantitative data to support qualitative data. Remember, making a clear picture even further. The data values and the benefits of resource comments on the project awareness, understanding of the project and Issue concerns the potential impact on the community. So these two processes are suitable for use in public scoping process.
Highlights
Modern developments in Thailand such as industrial estate, mining and dam bring many benefits, increased economic activity, trade, employment, resource for agricultural but, can have negative impacts on environment, health, cultural practices, community rights, social problem
The Mab ta Phut generate economic prosperity for local people when compare in Gross Provincial product in 2004, household income on the other hand many study in the area since 1998 was founded air pollution, water pollution, shoreline erosion, hazardous waste, intellectual and spiritual health,child and youth problem and health problem [1]
Public Scoping in Thailand are has many problem in “Lesson learn of System Development of Public Scoping and Health Impact Assessment: Experience in Thailand and International” [7] present Public Scoping process motivate people participation in development to make circumstance for publication their concern in socially significant impacts and use local wisdom to suggest alternative development and open space for accept knowledge to analyze impact in holistic approach of development for adjust policy or development project to sustain utility for all
Summary
Modern developments in Thailand such as industrial estate, mining and dam bring many benefits, increased economic activity, trade, employment, resource for agricultural but , can have negative impacts on environment, health, cultural practices, community rights, social problem. Public Scoping in Thailand are has many problem in “Lesson learn of System Development of Public Scoping and Health Impact Assessment: Experience in Thailand and International” [7] present Public Scoping process motivate people participation in development to make circumstance for publication their concern in socially significant impacts and use local wisdom to suggest alternative development and open space for accept knowledge to analyze impact in holistic approach of development for adjust policy or development project to sustain utility for all. In conclusion problem of public scoping in Thailand are clear in process but weakness in hiatus of practice, representative of participant, knowledge of stakeholder (consultant, government office, project owner, community leader, etc.) and policy maker are not aware in healthy policy. Public scoping process in Thailand need method to support for strengthen outcome
Sign-in/Register to view highlights & summary Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callMore From: Journal of Political Sciences & Public Affairs
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
