Abstract

We propose a path optimization method (POM) to evade the sign problem in the Monte-Carlo calculations for complex actions. Among many approaches to the sign problem, the Lefschetz-thimble path-integral method and the complex Langevin method are promising and extensively discussed. In these methods, real field variables are complexified and the integration manifold is determined by the flow equations or stochastically sampled. When we have singular points of the action or multiple critical points near the original integral surface, however, we have a risk to encounter the residual and global sign problems or the singular drift term problem. One of the ways to avoid the singular points is to optimize the integration path which is designed not to hit the singular points of the Boltzmann weight. By specifying the one-dimensional integration-path as z = t +if(t)(f ϵ R) and by optimizing f(t) to enhance the average phase factor, we demonstrate that we can avoid the sign problem in a one-variable toy model for which the complex Langevin method is found to fail. In this proceedings, we propose POM and discuss how we can avoid the sign problem in a toy model. We also discuss the possibility to utilize the neural network to optimize the path.

Highlights

  • Solving the sign problem for complex actions is one of the grand challenges in quantum many-body theories

  • The existence of the first order phase transition at high density generally induces the softening of the equation of state, which may be detected in heavy-ion collisions via collective flows [1,2,3] or conserved charge cumulants [4], or in the hypermassive neutron star properties which would be observed in binary neutron star mergers [5]

  • We examine the validity and usefulness of path optimization method (POM) in a one-variable toy model proposed in Ref. [38]

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Solving the sign problem for complex actions is one of the grand challenges in quantum many-body theories. Recent developments in the sign problem include the complex Langevin method (CLM) [24,25,26], the Lefschetz thimble method (LTM) [27,28,29], and the generalized Lefschetz thimble method (GLTM) [30, 31]. These methods are based on complexified field variables. The flow equation blows up somewhere [32], it is not easy to perform full integration over thimbles Because of these reasons, LTM has not yet been applied to finite density QCD.

Path optimization method
Application to a toy model
Summary
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call