Abstract
Although our country has established the exclusion rule of illegal evidence, there is no clear legislation on the evidence derived from illegal evidence. Therefore, the choice of "the fruit of the poison tree" leaves a huge space for controversy. Behind its choice not only implies the further coordination of procedural justice and substantive justice, but also becomes an important driving force to promote the modernization of China's judicial process.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
