Abstract

Although our country has established the exclusion rule of illegal evidence, there is no clear legislation on the evidence derived from illegal evidence. Therefore, the choice of "the fruit of the poison tree" leaves a huge space for controversy. Behind its choice not only implies the further coordination of procedural justice and substantive justice, but also becomes an important driving force to promote the modernization of China's judicial process.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call