Abstract

Background The use of internal thoracic arteries is an established method for treating coronary artery disease because of their excellent long-term patency rates. However, these results mainly referred to the left internal thoracic artery (LITA) grafted to the left anterior descending coronary artery (LAD). The aim of this study was to compare the patency rate of the LITA after its placement to the diagonal branch. Methods A total of 302 patients (median age 65 years) with previous arterial revascularization were retrospectively enrolled in the study. We compared LITA grafts to the LAD with those to the diagonal branch and with sequential LITA grafts to both vessels with respect to the patency rate over a median follow-up of 39 months after prior operation. Angiography was performed for recurrent angina. Results The average occlusion/stenosis rate of saphenous vein and LITA grafts were 43.1% and 14.1%, respectively ( p < 0.0001). Of the 302 patients, 248 had received a single LITA graft to the LAD; 21 patients, a single LITA graft to the diagonal branch; and 33 patients, a sequential LITA graft to both vessels. Thirty-three LITA grafts to the LAD (13.3%), three LITA grafts to the diagonal branch (14.3%), and six sequential LITA grafts to the LAD and the diagonal branch (18.2%) were occluded or stenosed more than 50%, respectively ( p = 0.68). Seventy-nine percent of LITA graft stenoses were located at the peripheral anastomosis. Conclusions Patency of single LITA grafts to the diagonal branch or sequential LITA grafts to the LAD and diagonal branch were comparable to single LITA grafts to the LAD. Most stenoses of LITA grafts were located at peripheral anastomoses.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.