Abstract

Recurrent patellofemoral instability is a common cause of knee pain and functional disability in adolescent and young adult patients, resulting in loss of time from work and sports. There are numerous factors that contribute to recurrent patellofemoral instability; these factors include tear of the medial patellofemoral ligament (MPFL), weakening or hypoplasia of the vastus medialis obliquus (VMO), trochlear dysplasia, increased tibial tuberosity-trochlear groove (TT-TG) distance (>20 mm), valgus malalignment, increased Q angle, malrotation secondary to internal femoral or external tibial torsion, patella alta, and generalized ligamentous laxity. A detailed history and a thorough physical examination are crucial to clinch an early, accurate diagnosis. Imaging studies play an important role to confirm the clinical diagnosis and also help to identify concomitant intra-articular pathologies. Initially, nonoperative management (including the use of physical therapy, patellar taping or brace) is offered to patients with acute, first-time patellar dislocations and most patients respond well to this mode of treatment. Surgical treatment is indicated for patients who have post-trauma osteochondral fracture or loose body; predisposing anatomical risk factors; recurrent, symptomatic instability; and who have failed an adequate trial of nonoperative management. Surgical treatments include MPFL reconstruction, proximal or distal realignment procedures, and trochleoplasty. Lateral release is often performed in combination with other procedures and seldom performed as an isolated procedure. An individualized case-by-case approach is recommended based on the underlying anatomical risk factors and radiographic abnormality.

Highlights

  • This chapter is divided into 2 major sections

  • Reconstruction of the medial patellofemoral ligament (MPFL) is typically indicated for patients with recurrent patellofemoral instability, with or without trochlear dysplasia, who have a normal tuberosity-trochlear groove (TT-TG) distance and a normal patellar height

  • Most physicians recommend an initial trial of nonoperative management for patients who present with first-time patellar dislocation, without intra-articular osteochondral fragments, severe injury to the medial patellar soft tissue stabilizers, and significant patellofemoral malalignment or dysplasia

Read more

Summary

Introduction

This chapter is divided into 2 major sections.

Patellofemoral instability: acute dislocation of the patella
Studies on the natural history of acute dislocation of the patella
Anatomy
10. Trochlear dysplasia or hypoplasia
Physical examination
Associated injuries
Radiographic studies
Nonoperative treatment
Operative treatment
Arthroscopy
Lateral release
Medial retinacular repair
Medial patellofemoral ligament repair and augmentation
Rehabilitation
2.10 Summary
Patellofemoral instability: recurrent dislocation of the patella
Clinical presentation
Sitting examination
Supine examination
Patellar tilt test
Patellar glide test
Patellar apprehension test
Patellar compression test
Tests for associated meniscal injury
Tests for associated cruciate and collateral ligament injury
Plain radiographs
The anteroposterior radiograph
The lateral radiograph
Assessment of patellar height
Assessment of trochlear morphology
Computed Tomography
Tibial Tuberosity-Trochlear Groove (TT-TG) Distance
3.3.10 Magnetic resonance imaging
Arthroscopic assessment
Lateral retinacular release
Proximal realignment procedures
Distal realignment procedures
Trochleoplasty
Medial Patellofemoral Ligament (MPFL) Reconstruction
At What Knee Flexion Angle the Graft Should be Fixed?
Use of Autograft versus Allograft for MPFL Reconstruction
Single-Bundle or Double-Bundle MPFL Reconstruction?
Outcomes of MPFL Reconstruction in Skeletally Immature Patients
Return to Play
Complications of MPFL Reconstruction
Authors’ Preferred Treatment of MPFL Reconstruction
4.10.2 Step 2
4.10.3 Step 3
4.10.5 Step 5
4.10.8 Step 8
Proper tunnel and footprint position
Postoperative pain and stiffness due to overtensioned graft
L-configuration diminishes patellar rotation
Discussion
Conclusions
Findings
Conflict of interest
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.