Abstract

Diversity-environment relationships are distinct across species pools, and as a result species from different biogeographic pools have different environmental preferences. Regional communities are drawn from available biogeographic pools, subject to environmental and dispersal constraints. Does shared biogeographic history of taxa lead to similar relationships with the environment? We test this idea in the Indian subcontinent, which is at the confluence of multiple biogeographic regions resulting in species from multiple biogeographic pools being distributed here. Species were classified as belonging to four biogeographic affinities based on their geographic distributions: eastern, northern, western and endemic. We investigated spatial patterns of species richness for all mammals (over 1° x 1° grid cells), for each biogeographic group and for 5 major mammalian orders. Generalized Additive Models (GAM) were used to investigate environment-diversity relationship for all mammals, each biogeographic group, and for major mammalian orders in the Indian subcontinent. Species richness of all mammals was found to be highest in the montane regions of the Eastern Himalayas and the Western Ghats. Species richness of each biogeographic group was highest at the border it shared with Asia, in the direction of immigration from Asia. Environment and spatial variables were both correlated with species richness in the Indian subcontinent and each biogeographic group showed a distinct richness-environment relationship. Additionally, biogeographic groups sorted along environmental space, in keeping with our predictions based on their global distributions. Finally, analyses across mammalian orders had low predictive value, suggesting that shared phylogenetic history is relatively less important than biogeographic ancestry in determining relationships to environment. We conclude that historical factors such as immigration and the distinct evolutionary histories of species impact species richness patterns in the Indian subcontinent. Our results provide insights into drivers of regional community assembly in transition zones where multiple biogeographic species pools co-exist.

Highlights

  • Species diversity at continental scales is accumulated through speciation and historical immigration (Buschke et al 2014)

  • Species richness for western species is highest in the west, along the western boundary of the Indian subcontinent, while that of the eastern species is highest along the northeastern parts of the Indian subcontinent

  • Western species richness peaked along the western boundary of the Indian subcontinent; many western species had ranges that extended into west Asia (e.g., Tatera indica, the Indian gerbil)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Species diversity at continental scales is accumulated through speciation and historical immigration (Buschke et al 2014). Species are constrained by their environment, requiring adaptation. Speciation, adaptation and historical immigration together result in globally observed species richness gradients, and biogeographic patterns (Gaston 2000). Species belonging to a common biogeographic pool may show similar climatic preferences owing to their shared biogeographic histories, even if they are not phylogenetically related to each other. For instance both squirrel monkeys and three-toed sloths share a preference for the tropical climates of S. Despite not being closely related (IUCN 2013)

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call