Abstract
Modern politics obligates U.S. presidents and presidential candidates to assert a commitment to reform. All nod in that direction; some create a spasm of reform fervor among the national leadership. Reform advocacy is bolstered by greater or lesser expression of outrage with the lunacy of particular loopholes in an incentive-destroying system. The polity is titillated by the display. New preferential treatments are devised by each Congress, and a very few minor ones are terminated. The tax expenditure budget grows each year, usually at a pace more rapid than the growth rate of appropriations. Eventually a new round of lamentations begins, and mostly, nothing changes. While these observations are not uncommon, and the events are barely remarkable any longer, another aspect of this situation passes almost completely unobserved, rather remarkably considering the persistent attachment of Americans in general, and officials of state governments in particular, to decentralized, federalist structures and states rights. This aspect is the loss of state revenue that occurs because state governments tie their income systems to that of the
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.