Abstract
The early Tertiary Orocopia-Chocolate fault in southern California was originally interpreted as a southwest-directed thrust assisting tectonic underplating of the Orocopia Schist beneath North America during subduction. However, the predicted thrusting direction is opposite to that observed for the fault. Although this problem appeared to be resolved by interpreting the Orocopia-Chocolate fault as a normal fault, this alternative is inconsistent with the fact that neither an early Tertiary breakaway nor early Tertiary upper plate extension has been observed. I suggest that the fault was a northeast-directed passive-roof thrust that linked with a southwest-directed basal decollement (the Vincent thrust) during early Tertiary flat subduction of the Farallon plate beneath North America. This model may also explain a similar structural relationship between the Main Central thrust and the South Tibet detachment fault in the Himalaya.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
