Abstract

Effective management of wild animal populations relies on an understanding of their spatio-temporal distributions. Passive acoustic monitoring (PAM) is a non-invasive method to investigate the distribution of free-ranging species that reliably produce sound. Critically endangered Antarctic blue whales (Balaenoptera musculus intermedia) (ABWs) co-occur with pygmy blue whales (B. m. brevicauda) (PBWs) around New Zealand. Nationally, both are listed as “data deficient” due to difficulties in access and visual sub-species identification. PAM was used to investigate the distributions of blue whalesviasub-species specific song detections in central New Zealand. Propagation models, incorporating ambient noise data, enabled the comparison of detections among recording locations in different marine environments. ABW detections peaked during austral winter and spring, indicating that New Zealand, and the South Taranaki Bight (STB) in particular, is a migratory corridor for ABWs. Some ABW calls were also detected during the breeding season (September and October). PBW calls were highly concentrated in the STB, particularly between March and May, suggesting that an aggregation of PBWs may occur here. Therefore, the STB is of great importance for both sub-species of blue whale. PBW detections were absent from the STB during parts of austral spring, but PBWs were detected at east coast locations during this time. Detection area models were valuable when interpreting and comparing detections among recording locations. The results provide sub-species specific information required for management of critically endangered ABWs and highlight the relative importance of central New Zealand for both sub-species of blue whale.

Highlights

  • The effective management of wild animal populations relies on a foundation of knowledge regarding their distribution and movements

  • Antarctic blue whales (ABWs) calls were detected in 4.1% and pygmy blue whales (PBWs) calls were detected in 21.2% of the subsamples

  • 20,751 blue whale calls were detected; 16.0% of detected calls were from ABWs and 84.0% were from PBWs (Tables 1, 2)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The effective management of wild animal populations relies on a foundation of knowledge regarding their distribution and movements. Passive acoustic monitoring (PAM) is a non-invasive technique that can be used to study the presence and distribution of animals that produce sound. Acoustic detections act as an indicator of animal presence, from which movements and distributions can be inferred, when acoustic recording devices are deployed over a large area (Hannay et al, 2013; Ross et al, 2018). An acoustic approach can be useful for vocal species that are difficult to study visually. Such instances occur when features used for identification are cryptic, and can be magnified if the study species is difficult to observe. Due to their low surface profile and short surfacing periods, deep-diving beaked whales of the family Ziphiidae demonstrate visual crypsis, but species-specific signal properties of their vocalisations enable acoustic identification (Baumann-Pickering et al, 2013)

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call