Abstract

This investigation compares and contrasts the use of meta-discourse markers in Pashto and English newspaper editorials as persuasive texts. The aforementioned markers are textual components that serve Halliday's (1985) textual and interpersonal objectives while not adding to the propositional substance of the text. Whether metadiscoursal markers were used differently in English and Pashto newspaper editorials was the main research issue. The most prevalent markers from the five subcategories of Text Connectives, Illocution Markers, Hedges, Emphatics, and Attitude Markers were initially found in both English and Pashto newspapers. The frequency of appearance of these markers was then noted in a corpus of 34 editorials (15,000 words each) that were randomly chosen from a variety of English and Pashto newspapers. The significance of the total x2 obs was then demonstrated using a two-way chi square analysis. The null hypothesis of no difference was thus categorically refuted. In order to determine the relative contributions of each subcategory to the overall x 2 value, one-way chi square analysis were employed on the subcategories. Our results showed that only two of the marker subcategories were statistically significant. The many spirits that live in the communities under study are mostly to blame for this discrepancy.

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.