Abstract
The theory of party identification-despite the important place it occupies in psychology and socialization literature-has rarely been clearly formulated or tested. An exception is the analysis by the Michigan Survey Research Center. Charles Helm sees a number of difficulties with the theory and suggests here a different formulation of the voting act. He argues that both from the explanatory and the moral standpoint the process of voting requires that a distinction be made between what people do and what happens to them.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
